I applied through college or university. The process took 3 weeks. I interviewed at Microsoft (Redmond, WA) in Dec 2010
Interview
I talked to a recruiter who set me up for an in-person one on one interview when Micrsoft recruited on campus. It took about 45 minutes and was mostly chat, except for one programming question. I was told to expect email from a recruiter within 3 weeks, and sure enough, within three weekes I was contacted by a scheduler for an onsite interview.
A day or two before the onsite, I was told which team I would be interviewing with. (I'm still rather unsatisfied with this part because I felt that I had no choice in the matter.) The onsite started out with a briefing with yet another recruiter who told me what to expect. Then I went into 4 successive interviews, each with a technical and a people skills portion. At the end of the day I met with the recruiter again to debrief. At that point, I knew better than to expect an offer because I knew I'd messed up several times early on in the interviews.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
If you're collaborating with a member of another team, how would you resolve a conflict?
I applied online. I interviewed at Microsoft (Melbourne)
Interview
After submitting an online application, I received a HackerRank assessment after passing the resume screening stage, then I was rejected after completing the assessment and did not proceed to further interview rounds.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
The assessment consisted of two LeetCode-medium-level coding questions to be completed within 75 minutes.
45 mins technical interview with a member of their San fran team. Very relaxed and informal but questions were focused and lots of follow ups. Easy to schedule as was over video conferencing platform
Straightforward technical loop overall, with strong interviewers at every stage. I genuinely enjoyed the in-depth conversations around technical challenges and algorithmic problem-solving — the entire process felt well-structured and genuinely engaging.